新航道

  2016年6月25日雅思写作真题回忆与解析分享给考生朋友们，每一次的考题回顾对于考生的备考都是非常有帮助的，希望大家多多参考。下面，就一起来看一下。
  TASK 1
  题目：

  The average number of hours of teaching by each teacher in different type of school in four countries in 2001.

  分析：
  本次考题是一个纯静态的图形，也就是说考生只需要对数据进行简单的比较。
  参考范文：
  As is demonstrated in this bar chart, there are some similarities and differences in the teaching time spent by 3 kinds of teachers in 4 countries.
  Teachers in upper secondary school were occupied the most time in Japan, Spain, Iceland and the USA. In particular, there was approximately 1100 hours’ working time for teachers in the USA. However, these figures for those in other 3 countries stood at 800 hours on average.
  By contrast, teachers in primary school generally worked a lower number of hours with 1000 hours in the USA and around 600 hours in other areas. Lower secondary school is seen from the chart to maintain a middle position in this list.
  In Iceland, teachers of all kinds experienced a nearly equal number of hours educating, in comparison to Spain and the USA where primary and lower secondary schools arranged similar working time for educators.
  Overall, USA dominates others in total teaching time in these 4 countries substantially.
  (160 words)
  TASK 2
  题目类别：
  科技类
  提问方式：
  双边讨论类
  考试题目：
  The range and quality of food has been improved with the development of technology and scientific advance. Some people think it is good and others think it is harmful. Discuss two sides and give your opinion.
  简单分析：
  这是一篇论述类的题目，烤鸭们要分别论证经过科技改良食物的优点和缺点，并且表明自己的立场。这个题目有一点的难度，因为科技是比较小众的雅思话题，也提醒各位烤鸭要注意复习的全面性，不能有侥幸的心理。
  Word count： 299
  Technology, the mighty force which is created by the comparatively smaller, walnut-shaped human brain, has changed the landscape, redefined the natural resources and even diversified the food we human beings rely on. The opponents and the proponents both hold their own justifications and I deem that there is no black-or-white conclusion of this issue.
  It is more likely that food shortage will undermine the wellbeing of masses less frequently if technology and scientific breakthrough improve the quality and range of choices. In the past when we human beings relied heavily on the rather limited sources of food, a spell of abnormal weather can pose a threat to the yield of the crops and the health condition of livestock, let alone the unpredicted climate change. However, the miserable past is no longer the case today. People are less prone to the impact of scarcity of the food supply and the quality as more food sources can be utilized with the advancement of science.
  On the other hand, the skeptics think technology a two-edged sword and the potential risks of technologically-modified food can never be underestimated. The security of some food generated by technology has not been identified, thereby entailing some unpredictable consequences. The genetically modified food, a milestone inhuman history, provides more options of food and enhances the quality on the one hand, also induces the doubts on its potential harm to human body and health.
  Personally, I suppose a reconciliation should be achieved between this two statements. What really matters on this issue is how properly the technologically- changed food can function in the society and what the following steps we shall take if some dire consequences arise. After all, it is the tiny brain that has the final say instead of the technology it creates.

请加新航道老师（微信号：shnc_2018）

百人留学备考群，名师答疑，助教监督，分享最新资讯，领取独家资料。扫码免费加入