新航道

  上海新航道托福培训小编特别整理了首场考试的详情，这次给大家带来了写的关于2020年9月9日托福独立写作范文及解析。希望帮助考生对照文本更好的研究真题，充分备考，争取理想成绩，实现留学梦想。

  9月9日托福独立写作题目及解析

  (重复2017年11月25日题目)

  Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?

  The more money people have, the more they should give away to charity.

  题目解析：

  本题属于绝对题，命题上要求有钱人就要多捐钱。对于这样带有绝对概念的题目，可以从should这个角度进行论述。

  Every year when Forbes Billionaire List is announced to the public, it always comes up with a continuous asking for those on the list to give more donations. From my perspective, this should be encouraged but not forced.

  ? 开头简洁：背景勾画+观点陈述

  Admittedly, requiring more funds from wealthy people does relieve most dilemmas facing philanthropic organizations. Without enough finance, they always struggle with their job, which means a lot of people in need cannot be assisted. If the money were possible to be gathered from wealthy groups, it would be a straw to clutch for countless poverty-stricken areas and its citizens. However, money disposal is a rather personal issue. To be specific, it may be venerable if one could allocate his or her property to voluntary work, but when they do not follow the public’s expectation, being denounced is unnecessary. Take many affluent people as an example, great wealth as they earned, we seldom hear about their donation to any charitable activity. Instead, their luxury lifestyle like wanton shopping or spending money with gay abandon is always reported, even this cannot be the reason to compel them for public service and they are the only manager for own fortune. Therefore, rich people should not be the target for moral abduction.

  ? 在陈述论点之前进行让步反驳丰富论述

  Second, charity should not be only counted on money. The purport of aid organizations is offering helping hand to the disadvantaged groups or victims and their misery and sufferings do not only rely on financial support. There is a charitable group for anti-domestic violence, whose main job is not collecting money but public’s recognition and comfort for those sufferers. So do many other groups in charity. Although funds sometimes may be the solution, the more is based on people’s responsibility and merciful heart. Worse, once the levy becomes compulsory, it may trigger repulsion for the activities which are supposed to be beneficial. In order to be off the hook, some fat cats even fabricate the annual salary or evade tax and these are definitely what we want. Worst of all, ordinary people would form a wrong concept that the charity is only the duty for the wealthy. Influenced by this, hardly can charity grasp the attention from all human beings and have a way with the ignorance. What if we encourage rich people? Results must be more positive.

  ? 论点转换到反面论证强调非必要性

  At this point, more money for charity is likely to be realized by people with more earning, however it does not have to be a command considering the potential consequence.

  ? 结尾强调中心论点回应开头

请加COCO老师（微信号：shnc_2018）

百人留学备考群，名师答疑，助教监督，分享最新资讯，领取独家资料。扫码免费加入